Weapons o Mass Destructions
Weapons of mass destructions have many negative consequences. One Important consequent is the large numbers of killed humans. The negative cost and poverty are negative consequence because the weapons are very expensive. The cold war was the first example of use weapons of mass destructions. According to Wikipedia was the bombs had killed 140 000 persons in Hiroshima and 80 000 in Nagasaki. In Hiroshima the victims from 15% to 20% die from injuries or illness attributed to radiations poisoning. To conclude atomic bombs endangering the humans, animals and environment, everybody is in danger.
There have been lots of documentaries and films that support your affirmation. It´s so sad the thousands of people affected by these weapons. As we all know, is not just people who died at the moment, genetic mutations, cancer and other disease are affecting their lives and the health of future generations. There should be instead weapons of mass construction that have a possitive impact in humanity.
ResponderEliminar